Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48411 - 48420 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
to corroborate his claim that $8,800, rather than the $5,600 reported by Detective Ricksecker, was in the lock
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony T. Hicks
, on the hair specimens. He then moved for a new trial contending, among other claims, that his trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31

State v. Allen M.
, and that this interest lapses once the child is born. Additionally, they claim that their kinship has no effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12260 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karie (Martin) Kammerer v. Robert A. Martin
the First Amendment claim of a father who did not have primary physical placement or legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8739 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 178
that, when a defendant gives the State timely notice that he or she claims that a custodial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34584 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
of discretion on a claim that the sentence it imposed was unduly harsh or unconscionable even if there is no new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] Frontsheet
on M.F.'s claim. ΒΆ59 The referee further recommends that we order restitution in seven of the 28
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143504 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Ganley
and for the due process claim, although the prosecutor emphasized that the court would not be making a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12438 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert W. Ganley v. Department of Corrections
and for the due process claim, although the prosecutor emphasized that the court would not be making a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12440 - 2017-09-21

Connie J. Motola v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of Workforce Development (DWD)[5] a discrimination claim against the City.[6] Ms. Motola alleged that under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17233 - 2005-03-31