Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48411 - 48420 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 48411 - 48420 of 83958 for simple case search.
State v. William J. Perry
months. I did not know at the time whether he had been convicted of an open drug case that was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9732 - 2005-03-31
months. I did not know at the time whether he had been convicted of an open drug case that was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9732 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the moving party’s affidavits or other proof to determine whether a prima facie case for summary judgment has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
to the moving party’s affidavits or other proof to determine whether a prima facie case for summary judgment has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252352 - 2020-01-09
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252352 - 2020-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to file a timely petition for certiorari review of a revocation decision may in some cases be excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
to file a timely petition for certiorari review of a revocation decision may in some cases be excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case was affected. [The victim] was actually almost an advocate for you in your case, and I can see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34523 - 2008-11-05
of the case was affected. [The victim] was actually almost an advocate for you in your case, and I can see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34523 - 2008-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Ross has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
a response. Ross has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
Laurie Lynn Muchow v. Michel Carl Muchow
to the particular case is discretionary. Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 384-85, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4207 - 2005-03-31
to the particular case is discretionary. Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 384-85, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4207 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Ross has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
a response. Ross has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP20 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659601 - 2023-05-24
. No. 2022AP20 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659601 - 2023-05-24
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144185 - 2015-07-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144185 - 2015-07-14