Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48421 - 48430 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

Ann Lorraine VanCauteren v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
creates a jurisdiction defect. She cites several federal cases and a Montana case to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13608 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
-Naranjo bar in this case because Hall is not using a means available under state law to challenge a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105358 - 2013-12-09

State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is entitled to have the enhanced parts of her sentences commuted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (“In any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798466 - 2024-05-14

City of Sturgeon Bay v. Gregory M. Ebel
. This case presents an undisputed set of facts to which this court must apply a statute, thereby presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9501 - 2005-03-31

State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
. 13, 2004). However, the supreme court summarily reversed our decision and remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6306 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Under the circumstances of the case, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment and violate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197808 - 2017-10-18

Mary McCoats v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
) the defendants failed to establish a prima facie case for summary judgment; (2) Wisconsin imposes liability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10522 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
became aware of the issue in discussing his case with another inmate. To establish newly discovered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143349 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Wis. Act 20 was passed, we decide this case based on the version of § 111.70(4)(mc)6. as it existed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145354 - 2017-09-21