Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48461 - 48470 of 74848 for public records.
Search results 48461 - 48470 of 74848 for public records.
Darnell Jackson v. Gary McCaughtry
if Jackson did not receive an advance copy of the report, there is no record that he raised the issue before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13674 - 2005-03-31
if Jackson did not receive an advance copy of the report, there is no record that he raised the issue before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert L. Perkins v. Virginia L. Anderson
discovery and scheduled a hearing. Perkins failed to appear, for reasons that do not appear in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5234 - 2017-09-19
discovery and scheduled a hearing. Perkins failed to appear, for reasons that do not appear in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5234 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620443 - 2023-02-14
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620443 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601100 - 2022-12-15
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601100 - 2022-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but she has not done so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
to file a response, but she has not done so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969333 - 2025-06-12
independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969333 - 2025-06-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
, it is not conclusive, and is not sufficient to resolve the ambiguous state of the record as a whole. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30391 - 2014-09-15
, it is not conclusive, and is not sufficient to resolve the ambiguous state of the record as a whole. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261842 - 2020-05-27
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261842 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
State v. David E.V.
required under ยง 48.365(2m)(a), STATS. Second, he contends the record fails to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8963 - 2017-09-19
required under ยง 48.365(2m)(a), STATS. Second, he contends the record fails to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8963 - 2017-09-19