Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48471 - 48480 of 68502 for did.
Search results 48471 - 48480 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
in front of one or more victims, and in neither incident did the perpetrator say anything to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36116 - 2009-04-08
in front of one or more victims, and in neither incident did the perpetrator say anything to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36116 - 2009-04-08
2008 WI APP 82
after the fraudulent accounts he opened were closed. We conclude they did not. As a result, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
after the fraudulent accounts he opened were closed. We conclude they did not. As a result, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that § 32.18 did not contain “clear, unambiguous, and peremptory language” necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
concluded that § 32.18 did not contain “clear, unambiguous, and peremptory language” necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
but he did not follow up on that recommendation. The record suggests Mr. Williams[’s] mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101363 - 2013-08-26
but he did not follow up on that recommendation. The record suggests Mr. Williams[’s] mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101363 - 2013-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court did not review the mandatory minimum sentence with Benka during the plea colloquy, see
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248716 - 2019-10-16
, the circuit court did not review the mandatory minimum sentence with Benka during the plea colloquy, see
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248716 - 2019-10-16
State v. David W. Oakley
, the existence of a separate restitution provision did not limit the court’s ability to require Heyn to reimburse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13902 - 2005-03-31
, the existence of a separate restitution provision did not limit the court’s ability to require Heyn to reimburse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Liberty Grove v. Charles Voight
also indicates that the Island Clipper did provide services to Michigan each year, in which instance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13982 - 2014-09-15
also indicates that the Island Clipper did provide services to Michigan each year, in which instance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13982 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s time for appeal. The court did not have the authority to enter the order nunc pro tunc. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30294 - 2007-09-17
the State’s time for appeal. The court did not have the authority to enter the order nunc pro tunc. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30294 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
question pertaining to dangerousness violated his right to due process because the question did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249458 - 2019-10-31
question pertaining to dangerousness violated his right to due process because the question did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249458 - 2019-10-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7656 - 2005-03-31
witness testimony in support of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7656 - 2005-03-31