Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 69399 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
because, unlike a motion for new trial, to prevail on a motion for reconsideration he would be required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105182 - 2013-12-04
because, unlike a motion for new trial, to prevail on a motion for reconsideration he would be required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105182 - 2013-12-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the elements of the offenses, the penalties that could be imposed, and the constitutional rights he waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
of the elements of the offenses, the penalties that could be imposed, and the constitutional rights he waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
Lynn E. Salonen v. Duane G. Powers
, that Salonen did not establish that he intended to harass her, and that the harassment injunction is overly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2901 - 2005-03-31
, that Salonen did not establish that he intended to harass her, and that the harassment injunction is overly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2901 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
also prevents Ruehl from raising issues that he could have raised in his no-merit response, absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61048 - 2011-03-14
also prevents Ruehl from raising issues that he could have raised in his no-merit response, absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61048 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to retire. Specifically, Dieman explained that he suffered from lower back problems, arthritis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46621 - 2010-02-01
decision to retire. Specifically, Dieman explained that he suffered from lower back problems, arthritis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46621 - 2010-02-01
CA Blank Order
, Schmidt filed a response to counsel’s no-merit report. In it, he appears to be challenging the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103537 - 2013-10-29
, Schmidt filed a response to counsel’s no-merit report. In it, he appears to be challenging the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103537 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the misdemeanor counts was two years, rather than the three years that was imposed. Counsel responded that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21
of the misdemeanor counts was two years, rather than the three years that was imposed. Counsel responded that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608361 - 2023-01-10
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608361 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
meritorious claim for an additional ten days of credit for time he spent in custody before sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257332 - 2020-04-08
meritorious claim for an additional ten days of credit for time he spent in custody before sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257332 - 2020-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Thompson contends that the first “new factor” is a portion of the prosecutor’s sentencing argument. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
). Thompson contends that the first “new factor” is a portion of the prosecutor’s sentencing argument. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29