Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910352 - 2025-02-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910352 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because Olmstead has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because Olmstead has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. The complaint in case no. 2012CF35 charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106647 - 2017-09-21
), we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. The complaint in case no. 2012CF35 charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, all further references are in the singular, although all are to the consolidated cases. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52521 - 2014-09-15
, all further references are in the singular, although all are to the consolidated cases. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52521 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not challenge the second search warrant No. 2016AP1513-CR 2 issued in this case under Franks v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21
not challenge the second search warrant No. 2016AP1513-CR 2 issued in this case under Franks v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the court. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102332 - 2017-09-21
to the court. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court impaneled a “numbers jury” n this case. Counsel concludes, however, that “[t]he ‘numbers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358267 - 2021-04-16
that the circuit court impaneled a “numbers jury” n this case. Counsel concludes, however, that “[t]he ‘numbers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358267 - 2021-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as case notes from December 2017 through August 2018. Those case notes indicated that Davis had twice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332998 - 2021-02-09
as case notes from December 2017 through August 2018. Those case notes indicated that Davis had twice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332998 - 2021-02-09