Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 474 U.S. at 59. This remains the case even in his reply brief, where Preston asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918191 - 2025-02-26
, 474 U.S. at 59. This remains the case even in his reply brief, where Preston asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918191 - 2025-02-26
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
, an unpublished case, as precedent for the arguments they made to this court. Neither attorney indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31
, an unpublished case, as precedent for the arguments they made to this court. Neither attorney indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31
Betty Pichelman v. Arnold Barfknecht
for the property owner to be immune from liability. Id. In this case, the Pichelmans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8689 - 2005-03-31
for the property owner to be immune from liability. Id. In this case, the Pichelmans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8689 - 2005-03-31
Shellie K. T. v. Brett P. C.
the particular case on the merits outweighs the finality of judgments; whether there is a meritorious defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25205 - 2006-05-22
the particular case on the merits outweighs the finality of judgments; whether there is a meritorious defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25205 - 2006-05-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders. Willis resolved these cases through a combination of guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders. Willis resolved these cases through a combination of guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22
they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531414 - 2022-06-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531414 - 2022-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
and reinstated the proceedings against him. The case was eventually plea-bargained. In exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21
and reinstated the proceedings against him. The case was eventually plea-bargained. In exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“the primary issue to be decided by the court in this case is one of statutory interpretation.” Lukanich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21
“the primary issue to be decided by the court in this case is one of statutory interpretation.” Lukanich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Morris
(Ct. App. 1999). Morris also attempts to reargue his case on appeal. This he cannot do. We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4566 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1999). Morris also attempts to reargue his case on appeal. This he cannot do. We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4566 - 2017-09-19