Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300357 - 2020-10-29
merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300357 - 2020-10-29
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Joshua J. Minich
Minich had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim. In short, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15
Minich had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim. In short, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15
Cara M. Wehrenberg v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
of statutory construction, not on contract law. Therefore, we reject Wehrenberg’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3832 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction, not on contract law. Therefore, we reject Wehrenberg’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a), G.G. claims none of the exceptions apply. Second, he relies on WIS. STAT. § 48.424(2)(b), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151842 - 2017-09-21
)(a), G.G. claims none of the exceptions apply. Second, he relies on WIS. STAT. § 48.424(2)(b), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151842 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089647 - 2026-03-12
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089647 - 2026-03-12
State v. William J. Foley
he entered his pleas, he decided that he wanted to withdraw his pleas. He claimed that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
he entered his pleas, he decided that he wanted to withdraw his pleas. He claimed that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
Edward Pryzina v. City of Thorp
. Pryzina has waived his right to claim error because the trial court did not take additional evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10079 - 2005-03-31
. Pryzina has waived his right to claim error because the trial court did not take additional evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10079 - 2005-03-31
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
ruled that the Montgomerys lacked standing. The Montgomerys, who are not related to Virginia, claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10509 - 2005-03-31
ruled that the Montgomerys lacked standing. The Montgomerys, who are not related to Virginia, claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10509 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven G. Loveday
of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. See § 941.23, Stats. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. See § 941.23, Stats. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Lee Greenwood
) and 961.41(3g)c, Stats. Greenwood claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
) and 961.41(3g)c, Stats. Greenwood claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31