Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48481 - 48490 of 82897 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
have to become a witness in the case, which was already in the second day of trial.[5] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76543 - 2012-01-17

State v. Stephen S.
did, and his TPR case was tried before a jury. The jury unanimously found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31

State v. Victory Fireworks, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 99-0243, 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15057 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jamie S.
the case, the judge shall enter an order waiving jurisdiction." Waiver of jurisdiction under § 48.18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11739 - 2017-09-20

Joseph Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0531
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13665 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David L. Nichols
2002 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-3032-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16563 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronald Leroy Beilke
that are involved in these charges. Because really this doesn’t come down to a case where we’re quibbling about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12430 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard C. Plank
2005 WI App 109 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2280-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS
and in particular the problematic process undertaken in this particular case.” The prosecution objected because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661991 - 2023-05-31