Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48491 - 48500 of 57708 for id.

[PDF] May a full-time municipal judge serve as a neutral third person, without pay, if appointed by a circuit court judge?
or a retired justice of the Supreme Court…” to resolve annexation disputes. Id. at n. 222. Because
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
is ‘[not] a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural … law.’” Id. (alteration in original; citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to each factor is committed to the court’s discretion. Id. Our review of the record confirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09

[PDF] State v. J.T. Jones-Johnson
discretion. See id. No. 98-2894-CR 4 Information about the victim’s thoughts on sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14601 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 2018AP1280-CRNM 2018AP1281-CRNM 2018AP1282-CRNM 4 discretion, see id., ¶17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252020 - 2020-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id.; and cf. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11

Charles R. Lutz v. Washburn County
when the need arose. See id. Although Lutz did not cite specific dates and times when the driveway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13471 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reached the same verdict without the error. Id., ¶48 n.14. The factors that aid a court in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06

State v. Montell Green
not necessarily transform an investigative stop into an arrest.” Id. at 448, 475 N.W.2d at 153. The question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11039 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tyeshawn D. Cohens
for the court to meaningfully assess a defendant’s claims. Id., ¶23. ¶5 Cohens’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25719 - 2006-07-04