Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4851 - 4860 of 70010 for as he.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the property assessment manual because he valued Zaug’s property without considering the income approach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93008 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ludwig Guzman
in September 1998. He was found guilty on both counts. Guzman filed post-verdict motions seeking a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15918 - 2017-09-21

Stephen J. Highman v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
for approximately seven years until October 22, 1992, when he took himself off duty for psychological reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2419 - 2005-03-31

State v. Agustin Velez
. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Velez raises three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11315 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lee Terrence Presley
of a controlled substance, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1)(cm)1g. (2003-04). 2 He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24830 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Antonio Manns
trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that the trial court improperly decided his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9915 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ronald J. Frank
. § 948.02(1). 1 He argues that (1) the trial court erred when it ruled that other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3944 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Stephen J. Highman v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
for approximately seven years until October 22, 1992, when he took himself off duty for psychological reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2419 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child under thirteen years of age. He maintains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673292 - 2023-07-05

State v. Lee Terrence Presley
substance, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)1g. (2003-04).[2] He also appeals from the order partially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24830 - 2006-05-30