Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4851 - 4860 of 83278 for case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
during her testimony. Wolske argues that because the search warrant application for a shed where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134389 - 2015-02-10

2009 WI APP 105
is not boundless. Id., ¶34. Our search of the relevant case law in Wisconsin and elsewhere has turned up no case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36809 - 2009-07-28

[PDF] WI APP 105
to judges is not boundless. Id., ¶34. Our search of the relevant case law in Wisconsin and elsewhere has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36809 - 2014-09-15

State v. Edward L. Riley
to be free of unlawful search and seizure; (2) the administrative regulations relating to custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31

State v. James H. Oswald
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1219-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12412 - 2005-03-31

State v. James H. Oswald
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1219-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12698 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joel L. Ritchie
to the analogous case law in a search warrant setting where the courts have adopted a deferential standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joel L. Ritchie
points us to the analogous case law in a search warrant setting where the courts have adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15766 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2021
cell phone. This case involves questions about privacy and search and seizure under the Fourth
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355114 - 2021-04-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pocket during a traffic stop because “the police lacked reasonable suspicion to search or pat down Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84178 - 2014-09-15