Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48501 - 48510 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48501 - 48510 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
., suggests that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
., suggests that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian C. Wegner
2000 WI App 231 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 231 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Virgil D. This is so in spite of the fact that Janeen had analyzed this case applying Virgil D. in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83169 - 2012-05-30
Virgil D. This is so in spite of the fact that Janeen had analyzed this case applying Virgil D. in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83169 - 2012-05-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not specifically acknowledge that Osinski may have assisted law enforcement in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
did not specifically acknowledge that Osinski may have assisted law enforcement in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
, holding that no arrest had occurred because, under the circumstances of the case, at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
, holding that no arrest had occurred because, under the circumstances of the case, at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995). ΒΆ8 In this case, we need go no further than the first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995). ΒΆ8 In this case, we need go no further than the first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Bayfield v. Andrew J. Peterson
in the case. The trial court conducted the refusal hearing and trial on the OWI charge at the same time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9962 - 2017-09-19
in the case. The trial court conducted the refusal hearing and trial on the OWI charge at the same time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9962 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was consequential to an issue in the case or that the result of the proceeding would have been different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33191 - 2014-09-15
was consequential to an issue in the case or that the result of the proceeding would have been different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33191 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by failing to properly investigate his case. Specifically, he contends that Attorney Love provided deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33123 - 2008-06-24
by failing to properly investigate his case. Specifically, he contends that Attorney Love provided deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33123 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders. Willis resolved these cases through a combination of guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders. Willis resolved these cases through a combination of guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12