Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48501 - 48510 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48501 - 48510 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1 This is a one-judge case pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2005-06). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32140 - 2014-09-15
. 1 This is a one-judge case pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2005-06). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties are abundantly familiar with the underlying facts of this case. Boiled down, Aaron has a rare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98014 - 2014-09-15
The parties are abundantly familiar with the underlying facts of this case. Boiled down, Aaron has a rare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98014 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury rendered its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143490 - 2017-09-21
defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury rendered its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910352 - 2025-02-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910352 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because Olmstead has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because Olmstead has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. The complaint in case no. 2012CF35 charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106647 - 2017-09-21
), we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. The complaint in case no. 2012CF35 charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, all further references are in the singular, although all are to the consolidated cases. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52521 - 2014-09-15
, all further references are in the singular, although all are to the consolidated cases. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52521 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not challenge the second search warrant No. 2016AP1513-CR 2 issued in this case under Franks v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21
not challenge the second search warrant No. 2016AP1513-CR 2 issued in this case under Franks v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21