Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48501 - 48510 of 68502 for did.
Search results 48501 - 48510 of 68502 for did.
State v. Christopher Lee Davis
authority, a circuit court did not possess the inherent power to dismiss a criminal case with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2445 - 2005-03-31
authority, a circuit court did not possess the inherent power to dismiss a criminal case with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2445 - 2005-03-31
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
that the trial court did not err in considering Sullivan’s refusal when determining his guilt of OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did not err in considering Sullivan’s refusal when determining his guilt of OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purchase. Later on that same day, VanRensselaer contacted Klavekoske again and did another controlled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103179 - 2017-09-21
purchase. Later on that same day, VanRensselaer contacted Klavekoske again and did another controlled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103179 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2 We note that Kalafi did not file a reply brief and that failure to respond to arguments made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
. 2 We note that Kalafi did not file a reply brief and that failure to respond to arguments made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the warrant did not establish the credibility of a confidential informant; (5) Hannah’s arrest lacked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133309 - 2017-09-21
for the warrant did not establish the credibility of a confidential informant; (5) Hannah’s arrest lacked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133309 - 2017-09-21
Laurie M. Marcukaitis v. State of Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
by credible and substantial evidence. For example, she maintains that Platta did not actually see her put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7219 - 2005-03-31
by credible and substantial evidence. For example, she maintains that Platta did not actually see her put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7219 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in front of one or more victims, and in neither incident did the perpetrator say anything to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36116 - 2009-04-08
in front of one or more victims, and in neither incident did the perpetrator say anything to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36116 - 2009-04-08
2008 WI APP 82
after the fraudulent accounts he opened were closed. We conclude they did not. As a result, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
after the fraudulent accounts he opened were closed. We conclude they did not. As a result, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that § 32.18 did not contain “clear, unambiguous, and peremptory language” necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
concluded that § 32.18 did not contain “clear, unambiguous, and peremptory language” necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
but he did not follow up on that recommendation. The record suggests Mr. Williams[’s] mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101363 - 2013-08-26
but he did not follow up on that recommendation. The record suggests Mr. Williams[’s] mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101363 - 2013-08-26