Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48521 - 48530 of 98342 for court records search online.
Search results 48521 - 48530 of 98342 for court records search online.
State v. Randy J. Netzer
… on the record in open court … the only inference possible from the totality of the facts and circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6108 - 2005-03-31
… on the record in open court … the only inference possible from the totality of the facts and circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Netzer
articulate a plea … on the record in open court … the only inference possible from the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19
articulate a plea … on the record in open court … the only inference possible from the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Armando Maciel v. Javed I. Qureshi
provides: Discretionary reversal. In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7377 - 2017-09-20
provides: Discretionary reversal. In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7377 - 2017-09-20
Armando Maciel v. Javed I. Qureshi
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7377 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
unequivocally answered yes. There is no indication in the record that the circuit court’s determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117171 - 2017-09-21
unequivocally answered yes. There is no indication in the record that the circuit court’s determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117171 - 2017-09-21
Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
for review, with appropriate references to the record.” An appellate court is improperly burdened where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4799 - 2005-03-31
for review, with appropriate references to the record.” An appellate court is improperly burdened where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4799 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion.5 Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95943 - 2014-09-15
merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion.5 Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joan M. Kudlick v. James E. Bivens
, not the appellate court, to determine. See id. at 172. We review the record to locate evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7359 - 2017-09-20
, not the appellate court, to determine. See id. at 172. We review the record to locate evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7359 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041931 - 2025-11-25
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041931 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the trial court’s explanations of its sentencing decision, we are unconvinced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211006 - 2018-04-09
the record and the trial court’s explanations of its sentencing decision, we are unconvinced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211006 - 2018-04-09