Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48551 - 48560 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 48551 - 48560 of 83395 for simple case search.
State v. Bobbie K.
if there is good cause for not hearing the cases separately. (h) Any period of delay resulting from the need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
if there is good cause for not hearing the cases separately. (h) Any period of delay resulting from the need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at a critical stage of his case; (3) prosecutorial misconduct; and (4) the ineffective assistance of both his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
at a critical stage of his case; (3) prosecutorial misconduct; and (4) the ineffective assistance of both his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
State v. Johnny D. Polk
and the case would not be adjourned again. At this point, Polk fired Bartell and paid a $500 retainer fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3533 - 2005-03-31
and the case would not be adjourned again. At this point, Polk fired Bartell and paid a $500 retainer fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tee & Bee, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13691 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13691 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Christopher asserts for the first time in his reply brief that “the issue in this case does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170448 - 2017-09-21
. 2 Christopher asserts for the first time in his reply brief that “the issue in this case does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
robbery as party to a crime relating to the robbery of Jeff. The case proceeded to trial and a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21
robbery as party to a crime relating to the robbery of Jeff. The case proceeded to trial and a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2016 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP358-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176538 - 2017-09-21
2016 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP358-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176538 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
undermined the case’s outcome. The appellant “must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02
undermined the case’s outcome. The appellant “must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case that would support the idea that Lawver was punished because he was expressing a particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04
of the State’s case that would support the idea that Lawver was punished because he was expressing a particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04