Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 82649 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363245 - 2021-05-05

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary Kathleen Arthur
2004 WI 66 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-3448-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
4 ¶6 The case proceeded to trial on all three claims. The Companies renewed their pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117397 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
to substitute attorney Carol Conklin for Filippo. Filippo did no additional work on the case. At a telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27997 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Danforth
of WIS. STAT. § 908.08(2) (2003-04). 1 The State then moved to dismiss the case, and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7582 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
counsel considered other potential issues that arise in cases tried to a jury, i.e., jury selection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101751 - 2013-09-10

Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
in a 1946 deed, we reverse the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves an island located in Chain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS
any sort of quantification or other qualifier, and we are not persuaded that is the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12

[PDF] NOTICE
of the State’s case because there was insufficient evidence to convict him due to the State’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27466 - 2014-09-15