Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 90939 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 90939 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Mikulance
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Kenosha County: MARY KAY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Kenosha County: MARY KAY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
Nancy M. White v. Jeffrey A. White
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Patrick t. sheedy, Reserve Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2897 - 2010-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Patrick t. sheedy, Reserve Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2897 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Anderson
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID A. HANSHER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21458 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID A. HANSHER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619730 - 2023-02-08
an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619730 - 2023-02-08
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Governor Evers' Response to Respondents' Motion for Reconsideration of January 11, 2024 Order
claim. That alone is dispositive of Respondents’ second motion. Second, Respondents’ second
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012624eversresponse.pdf - 2024-01-26
claim. That alone is dispositive of Respondents’ second motion. Second, Respondents’ second
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012624eversresponse.pdf - 2024-01-26
CA Blank Order
was free to argue for a different disposition. Mack confirmed that he understood the terms of the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94654 - 2013-03-26
was free to argue for a different disposition. Mack confirmed that he understood the terms of the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94654 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2012AP1308-CRNM 3 parties further explained that Mack was free to argue for a different disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP1308-CRNM 3 parties further explained that Mack was free to argue for a different disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 13, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16658 - 2005-03-31
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 13, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 13, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16659 - 2005-03-31
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 13, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16659 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 13, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16657 - 2005-03-31
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 13, 2003 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16657 - 2005-03-31