Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 52011 for legal separation.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 52011 for legal separation.
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
action or proceeding. (d) When a judge prepared as counsel any legal instrument or paper whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
action or proceeding. (d) When a judge prepared as counsel any legal instrument or paper whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
State v. Adrian Castelan-Martinez
stipulated that he was legally intoxicated, that he was aware that his operating privileges were revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24892 - 2006-04-25
stipulated that he was legally intoxicated, that he was aware that his operating privileges were revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24892 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Rakhoda Amani Beni
the report. There was paraphrasing; and I stated no, that legal documents and what have you said in court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18449 - 2017-09-21
the report. There was paraphrasing; and I stated no, that legal documents and what have you said in court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18449 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The application of facts to a legal standard is a question of law subject to independent review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86522 - 2014-09-15
. The application of facts to a legal standard is a question of law subject to independent review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Parker recognized that the girl could not legally consent. The trial court found that both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197745 - 2017-10-10
Parker recognized that the girl could not legally consent. The trial court found that both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197745 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and relevant legal principles for at least fifteen topics with no connection drawn to the facts of Wright’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128232 - 2017-09-21
and relevant legal principles for at least fifteen topics with no connection drawn to the facts of Wright’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Norman R.
we review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard, Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5323 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard, Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5323 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James L. Schuman
: “What is the legal definition of entrapment?,” to which the court replied: “The court has given you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14356 - 2014-09-15
: “What is the legal definition of entrapment?,” to which the court replied: “The court has given you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14356 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John J. Callanan v. Bradley Kimmel Properties, Inc.
for the conclusion. Here, Bradley Kimmel offered a legal conclusion but not a factual basis regarding his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13616 - 2017-09-21
for the conclusion. Here, Bradley Kimmel offered a legal conclusion but not a factual basis regarding his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13616 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward J. Parker
. Arguments unsupported by references to legal authority will not be considered by this court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11493 - 2005-03-31
. Arguments unsupported by references to legal authority will not be considered by this court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11493 - 2005-03-31