Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 48561 - 48570 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Thomas McPhetridge v. Jon E. Litscher
implausible claim that he innocently left the drink to sit out overnight in order to improve its taste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2005-03-31
implausible claim that he innocently left the drink to sit out overnight in order to improve its taste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368325 - 2021-05-25
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368325 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Lynch
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and sentencing him to forty- two months in prison. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15547 - 2017-09-21
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and sentencing him to forty- two months in prison. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Brunette
claims that the policy underlying the extended appeal time in § 808.04(5), is to afford those persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11277 - 2017-09-19
claims that the policy underlying the extended appeal time in § 808.04(5), is to afford those persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11277 - 2017-09-19
Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
, leaving the Schultzes in no position to claim estoppel because he believed and relied on that incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31
, leaving the Schultzes in no position to claim estoppel because he believed and relied on that incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and denied Curtis’s motion without a hearing. Curtis now appeals, with the sole claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49246 - 2014-09-15
, and denied Curtis’s motion without a hearing. Curtis now appeals, with the sole claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49246 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
faced and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361849 - 2021-04-29
faced and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361849 - 2021-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
on this claim. ¶7 Ramuta also argues that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
on this claim. ¶7 Ramuta also argues that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417740 - 2021-09-01
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417740 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
WI 17
Robinson states in the stipulation that he does not No. 2006AP2786-D 4 claim that any
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28043 - 2014-09-15
Robinson states in the stipulation that he does not No. 2006AP2786-D 4 claim that any
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28043 - 2014-09-15