Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48571 - 48580 of 57646 for id.
Search results 48571 - 48580 of 57646 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
suppression been ordered. See id. at 370-71. ¶8 Korotka attempts to distinguish Armstrong on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
suppression been ordered. See id. at 370-71. ¶8 Korotka attempts to distinguish Armstrong on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal or in his or her original postconviction motion. See id., 185 Wis. 2d at 185-86. A new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33534 - 2008-07-30
appeal or in his or her original postconviction motion. See id., 185 Wis. 2d at 185-86. A new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33534 - 2008-07-30
State v. Maurice A. Jones
., or other mandated procedures set out in the Bangert opinion,” based upon the plea record. Id. at 830. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5229 - 2005-03-31
., or other mandated procedures set out in the Bangert opinion,” based upon the plea record. Id. at 830. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
activity may be afoot, and that action would be appropriate. See id. at 20-22. “The question of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70219 - 2011-08-24
activity may be afoot, and that action would be appropriate. See id. at 20-22. “The question of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70219 - 2011-08-24
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
the record to determine if the denial of the award was appropriate. See id. at 291. The record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
the record to determine if the denial of the award was appropriate. See id. at 291. The record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
Clarence Werner v. Wayne Nohelty
. App. 1993). Whether to grant the motion is within the trial court's discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15508 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1993). Whether to grant the motion is within the trial court's discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stacy L. Blunt v. Byran Bartow
and making an argument for the litigant. We cannot serve as both advocate and judge. Id. at 164-65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25051 - 2017-09-21
and making an argument for the litigant. We cannot serve as both advocate and judge. Id. at 164-65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25051 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the benefit of hindsight, are “virtually unchallengeable” and do not constitute ineffective assistance. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104017 - 2017-09-21
the benefit of hindsight, are “virtually unchallengeable” and do not constitute ineffective assistance. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Chambers
been a clear misuse of No. 95-1724-CR -5- discretion. Id. We look to see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9250 - 2017-09-19
been a clear misuse of No. 95-1724-CR -5- discretion. Id. We look to see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9250 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
process.” Id. (quoted source omitted). We agree with Harris that the issues presented in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187247 - 2017-09-21
process.” Id. (quoted source omitted). We agree with Harris that the issues presented in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187247 - 2017-09-21