Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48591 - 48600 of 55920 for CAROL J SCHMIDT'S.
Search results 48591 - 48600 of 55920 for CAROL J SCHMIDT'S.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Parrish
County: DANIEL L. KONKOL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3038 - 2017-09-19
County: DANIEL L. KONKOL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose C. McGill
of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This is a challenge to a protective frisk for weapons
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17401 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This is a challenge to a protective frisk for weapons
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 55
., and Gundrum, J. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218118 - 2018-12-13
., and Gundrum, J. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218118 - 2018-12-13
wi app 19 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP122 Complete Title of ...
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas Armstrong and Beth J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91299 - 2013-02-25
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas Armstrong and Beth J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91299 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
economic circumstances of the parties, see WIS. STAT. § 767.61(3)(j), observing that, due to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186581 - 2017-09-21
economic circumstances of the parties, see WIS. STAT. § 767.61(3)(j), observing that, due to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Portage County: ROBERT J. SHANNON, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466413 - 2021-12-27
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Portage County: ROBERT J. SHANNON, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466413 - 2021-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rusk County: J. MICHAEL BITNEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669978 - 2023-06-20
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rusk County: J. MICHAEL BITNEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669978 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: ABRAHAMSON, J., dissents. (Opinion Filed) NOT PARTICIPATING
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158268 - 2017-09-21
: JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: ABRAHAMSON, J., dissents. (Opinion Filed) NOT PARTICIPATING
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158268 - 2017-09-21
State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
, the cause was orally argued by Michael Resis, and submitted on the briefs of Michael Resis and Timothy J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3372 - 2005-04-24
, the cause was orally argued by Michael Resis, and submitted on the briefs of Michael Resis and Timothy J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3372 - 2005-04-24
[PDF]
WI App 38
. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ. ¶1 GILL, J. Scot Van Oudenhoven appeals an order affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809220 - 2024-08-21
. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ. ¶1 GILL, J. Scot Van Oudenhoven appeals an order affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809220 - 2024-08-21