Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 68275 for did.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 68275 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him and denied that he had an outstanding warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652737 - 2023-05-10
the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him and denied that he had an outstanding warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652737 - 2023-05-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
may be distributed. However, Lyubchenko did not support these assertions with legal authority, nor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558956 - 2022-08-25
may be distributed. However, Lyubchenko did not support these assertions with legal authority, nor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558956 - 2022-08-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
agreed to represent the clients even though she did not have prior experience handling medical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211556 - 2018-04-20
agreed to represent the clients even though she did not have prior experience handling medical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211556 - 2018-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
several motions to extend the time to file a postdisposition motion or notice of appeal and did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
several motions to extend the time to file a postdisposition motion or notice of appeal and did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
State v. Perry A. Felton
; (3) determined that his trial lawyer did not give him prejudicially deficient representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6831 - 2017-09-20
; (3) determined that his trial lawyer did not give him prejudicially deficient representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6831 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that you mentioned?” He responded, “Nothing. Absolutely nothing.”4 Thus, Cheryl claims, Tom did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571791 - 2022-09-27
that you mentioned?” He responded, “Nothing. Absolutely nothing.”4 Thus, Cheryl claims, Tom did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571791 - 2022-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
) did not object when the prosecutor called Grayer’s act “intentional” during closing argument; (3) did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64979 - 2011-05-31
) did not object when the prosecutor called Grayer’s act “intentional” during closing argument; (3) did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64979 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be selected from the county. We conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014981 - 2025-09-25
be selected from the county. We conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014981 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the chemical test because the deputy sheriff who questioned him did not have a reasonable suspicion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87250 - 2014-09-15
to the chemical test because the deputy sheriff who questioned him did not have a reasonable suspicion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87250 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A. The State complied with discovery statutes and did not violate Jackson’s due process rights regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21
. A. The State complied with discovery statutes and did not violate Jackson’s due process rights regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21