Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 63219 for records.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 63219 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representation “unless it is totally unsupported by facts in the record.” Id., ¶29. B. September 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192798 - 2017-09-21
representation “unless it is totally unsupported by facts in the record.” Id., ¶29. B. September 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192798 - 2017-09-21
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Robert G. Riegelman
and complaint were filed and served, the alleged attorney of record who was licensed in Wisconsin (Weinstine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16411 - 2005-03-31
and complaint were filed and served, the alleged attorney of record who was licensed in Wisconsin (Weinstine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial record containing his original bond conditions was in the court of appeals. Thus, Combs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30405 - 2014-09-15
the trial record containing his original bond conditions was in the court of appeals. Thus, Combs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30405 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Robert G. Riegelman
filed and served, the alleged attorney of record who was licensed in Wisconsin (Weinstine) had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16411 - 2017-09-21
filed and served, the alleged attorney of record who was licensed in Wisconsin (Weinstine) had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16411 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of fact or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32359 - 2008-04-07
a question of fact or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32359 - 2008-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony. We reject Holifield’s arguments because they are belied by the Record, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
testimony. We reject Holifield’s arguments because they are belied by the Record, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
There is some confusion in the record over the use of the term “postconviction counsel.” Branch filed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32359 - 2014-09-15
There is some confusion in the record over the use of the term “postconviction counsel.” Branch filed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32359 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William E. Spaeth
that the record does not adequately establish the defendant’s prior OAR convictions, we reverse and commute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17032 - 2017-09-21
that the record does not adequately establish the defendant’s prior OAR convictions, we reverse and commute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17032 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Consistent with the record and the parties’ briefing in this court, we use the term “C- store” to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
Consistent with the record and the parties’ briefing in this court, we use the term “C- store” to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
State v. Steven T. Geary
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12908 - 2005-03-31
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12908 - 2005-03-31