Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 5629 for writ.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 5629 for writ.
Rhinelander Family Housing v. City of Rhinelander Board of Review
brief cites to R20, the City of Rhinelander Board of Review's trial brief in opposition to a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11204 - 2005-03-31
brief cites to R20, the City of Rhinelander Board of Review's trial brief in opposition to a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 79
the district court's judgment. The ensuing petition for writ of certiorari was granted and the U.S. Supreme
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173267 - 2017-09-21
the district court's judgment. The ensuing petition for writ of certiorari was granted and the U.S. Supreme
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 79
affirmed the district court's judgment. The ensuing petition for writ of certiorari was granted
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173396 - 2017-09-21
affirmed the district court's judgment. The ensuing petition for writ of certiorari was granted
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173396 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court for a writ of certiorari. The court denied the petition on grounds that record evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31988 - 2008-03-04
to the circuit court for a writ of certiorari. The court denied the petition on grounds that record evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31988 - 2008-03-04
State v. William E. Marberry
for a supervisory writ. There is no indication in the record that Marberry made any motion or request to expedite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31
for a supervisory writ. There is no indication in the record that Marberry made any motion or request to expedite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interests of justice. Id., ¶1. ¶9 Whitehead subsequently filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271516 - 2020-07-21
in the interests of justice. Id., ¶1. ¶9 Whitehead subsequently filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271516 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
Rule Order
; and to appeals and extraordinary writs. c. Paragraph (hm) applies to cases in which all parties
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116166 - 2017-09-21
; and to appeals and extraordinary writs. c. Paragraph (hm) applies to cases in which all parties
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116166 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 79
affirmed the district court's judgment. The ensuing petition for writ of certiorari was granted
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173396 - 2017-09-21
affirmed the district court's judgment. The ensuing petition for writ of certiorari was granted
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173396 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stacey R. Wilhelm
. A challenge to a probation revocation must be made by writ of certiorari. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Schwarz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6542 - 2005-03-31
. A challenge to a probation revocation must be made by writ of certiorari. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Schwarz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6542 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
was to bring a writ of certiorari, which Murray had not done. The court concluded that Murray did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
was to bring a writ of certiorari, which Murray had not done. The court concluded that Murray did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31