Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sustained Armstrong’s revocation. Armstrong sought certiorari review. The circuit court affirmed DHA’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288285 - 2020-09-16
sustained Armstrong’s revocation. Armstrong sought certiorari review. The circuit court affirmed DHA’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288285 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2011, and 2012. West argues it is entitled to relief in this certiorari review because the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
, 2011, and 2012. West argues it is entitled to relief in this certiorari review because the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of certiorari. DOT may be correct. We do not address that issue, however, because it is not germane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
of certiorari. DOT may be correct. We do not address that issue, however, because it is not germane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review, arguing the Board had erred by not recognizing the deck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review, arguing the Board had erred by not recognizing the deck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review, arguing the Board had erred by not recognizing the deck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25313 - 2017-09-21
petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review, arguing the Board had erred by not recognizing the deck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25313 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
argues it is entitled to relief in this certiorari review because the Board committed various legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
argues it is entitled to relief in this certiorari review because the Board committed various legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
by the cost approach was appropriate. Wilson Realty filed a petition for certiorari review with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7474 - 2005-03-31
by the cost approach was appropriate. Wilson Realty filed a petition for certiorari review with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7474 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by certiorari is limited to: (1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21
by certiorari is limited to: (1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
was appropriate. Wilson Realty filed a petition for certiorari review with the circuit court, which affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20
was appropriate. Wilson Realty filed a petition for certiorari review with the circuit court, which affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
4 ¶5 Judicial review of revocation decisions by certiorari is limited to: (1) Whether the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
4 ¶5 Judicial review of revocation decisions by certiorari is limited to: (1) Whether the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15