Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48601 - 48610 of 56214 for n y c.
Search results 48601 - 48610 of 56214 for n y c.
State v. Brian K. Rice
. Section 973.09(1)(a) provides: Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
. Section 973.09(1)(a) provides: Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
10AP2995 County of Sheboygan v. Jeffrey L. Bubolz.doc
. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009-10 version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62146 - 2011-04-05
. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009-10 version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62146 - 2011-04-05
State v. Antwan Battles
, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting the photo. C. Admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting the photo. C. Admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(am), (b) or (c) Wis. Stats., contrary to sec. 948.025(1)(b) Wis. Stats.” Williams did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238128 - 2019-03-26
)(am), (b) or (c) Wis. Stats., contrary to sec. 948.025(1)(b) Wis. Stats.” Williams did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238128 - 2019-03-26
State v. Andrea M. White
. See Standards for Criminal Justice, The Prosecution Function 3-1.1(c) (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9639 - 2005-03-31
. See Standards for Criminal Justice, The Prosecution Function 3-1.1(c) (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is supported by law. ¶13 “[C]ontracts require the element of mutual meeting of the minds and of intention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33068 - 2014-09-15
is supported by law. ¶13 “[C]ontracts require the element of mutual meeting of the minds and of intention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33068 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to Wis. Stat. § 30.681(1)(c) and judgment was entered against him on the intoxicated operation charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22
to Wis. Stat. § 30.681(1)(c) and judgment was entered against him on the intoxicated operation charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. M.
that the videotaped testimony of his daughters was plainly inadmissible under WIS. STAT. § 908.08(3)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
that the videotaped testimony of his daughters was plainly inadmissible under WIS. STAT. § 908.08(3)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
Certification
William C. McConkey, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. J. B. Van Hollen
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36114 - 2009-04-08
William C. McConkey, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. J. B. Van Hollen
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36114 - 2009-04-08
[PDF]
WI 26
and recommendation of the referee, Richard C. Ninneman, approving a stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94427 - 2014-09-15
and recommendation of the referee, Richard C. Ninneman, approving a stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94427 - 2014-09-15