Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48621 - 48630 of 54850 for n c c.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the deficiency and reasonableness of the trial counsel’s performance.” State v. Jenkins, 2014 WI 59, ¶64 n.31
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650570 - 2023-05-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentencing. See State v. Wegner, 2000 WI App 231, ¶7 n.1, 239 Wis. 2d 96, 619 N.W.2d 289
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157947 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
may not participate in a case as an investigating or reviewing officer.” Id. at 572 n.20, (citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31179 - 2007-12-12

State v. Roger P. Barber
double jeopardy would not be violated by a retrial.” Barber, unpublished slip op. at 12 n.6. Given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4992 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
in a reply brief. See Swartwout v. Bilsie, 100 Wis. 2d 342, 346 n.2, 302 N.W.2d 508 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58119 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 137, 142 (1999)). Bucki, 393 Wis. 2d 434, ¶52 n.22. ¶6 Beyond that, Sypher faults the expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See State v. Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d 721, 747 n.10, 546 N.W.2d 406 (1996) (“It is well-established
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574695 - 2022-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 1998). “[N]ot all errors warrant a mistrial, and ‘the law prefers [a] less drastic alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129364 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
assume that he did have implied consent to do so.” The trial court stated: [I]n this case I believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29356 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Wautoma Preschool, Inc. v. Andrea Jahnz-Bertotto
hearings. See WIS. STAT. § 911.01(4)(d). However, “[a]n essential finding of fact may not be based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2215 - 2017-09-19