Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48621 - 48630 of 74848 for public records.
Search results 48621 - 48630 of 74848 for public records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the 2 We note that the background section of Thompson’s brief is devoid of citations to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35622 - 2014-09-15
the 2 We note that the background section of Thompson’s brief is devoid of citations to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35622 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark David Hayter
time that some of the controlled buys had been tape-recorded. Hayter moved for a mistrial. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6040 - 2005-03-31
time that some of the controlled buys had been tape-recorded. Hayter moved for a mistrial. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6040 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
citation in the record contains no such language on its reverse side. Additionally, the various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
citation in the record contains no such language on its reverse side. Additionally, the various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181210 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181210 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing Close’s motion on jurisdictional grounds. In Pierce County case No. 2004CF165, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619564 - 2023-02-07
dismissing Close’s motion on jurisdictional grounds. In Pierce County case No. 2004CF165, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619564 - 2023-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
at 717. To determine subjective bias, we inquire “whether the record reflects that the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31953 - 2008-02-27
at 717. To determine subjective bias, we inquire “whether the record reflects that the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31953 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88620 - 2014-09-15
when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Kistner should have inquired into Hitchon’s criminal record, which, in turn, would have revealed she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53086 - 2014-09-15
, Kistner should have inquired into Hitchon’s criminal record, which, in turn, would have revealed she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not involved in the crime. The court also found that the record established that trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31387 - 2014-09-15
was not involved in the crime. The court also found that the record established that trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31387 - 2014-09-15