Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48671 - 48680 of 68276 for did.
Search results 48671 - 48680 of 68276 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Edwards
. The trial court concluded that the taking of the blood sample from Edwards did not violate the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court concluded that the taking of the blood sample from Edwards did not violate the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
shenanigans” did not give the judge the right to impose an “unconstitutionally outrageous fine”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29588 - 2014-09-15
shenanigans” did not give the judge the right to impose an “unconstitutionally outrageous fine”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29588 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to seven years’ imprisonment on July 23, 2004. Smith did not appeal. In January 2011, Smith filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
to seven years’ imprisonment on July 23, 2004. Smith did not appeal. In January 2011, Smith filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2008AP2297 5 did not disregard the support objective of maintenance, but concluded that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2008AP2297 5 did not disregard the support objective of maintenance, but concluded that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian R. Huisman
before hearing his Miranda rights. His pre-Miranda statements were largely neutral and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14516 - 2017-09-21
before hearing his Miranda rights. His pre-Miranda statements were largely neutral and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14516 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such No. 2012AP2699 4 arguments in his reply brief, he did not. Instead, his reply brief was entirely silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107151 - 2017-09-21
such No. 2012AP2699 4 arguments in his reply brief, he did not. Instead, his reply brief was entirely silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Pam Wallace
, 2003. WIS. STAT. § 893.735(2). Because Elkins did not file his certiorari action until September 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7232 - 2017-09-20
, 2003. WIS. STAT. § 893.735(2). Because Elkins did not file his certiorari action until September 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7232 - 2017-09-20
State v. Kenneth L. Champion
The record conclusively establishes that trial counsel did not unreasonably abandon a suppression issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3228 - 2005-03-31
The record conclusively establishes that trial counsel did not unreasonably abandon a suppression issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
testified that he did not “recall [the gun] being a revolver” and that it “may have been” a .45
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204657 - 2017-12-06
testified that he did not “recall [the gun] being a revolver” and that it “may have been” a .45
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204657 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
store and did not know its contents. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
store and did not know its contents. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16