Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48691 - 48700 of 57646 for id.
Search results 48691 - 48700 of 57646 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Joel N. Nitka
person would have believed in the position of the defendant ...." Id. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
person would have believed in the position of the defendant ...." Id. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of default judgments would reduce deterrence to litigation-delay.” Id. Excusable neglect is “that neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46065 - 2014-09-15
of default judgments would reduce deterrence to litigation-delay.” Id. Excusable neglect is “that neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46065 - 2014-09-15
State v. David L. Gray
for the omission.” Id. at 274. ¶7 As we noted above, Gray sought direct postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
for the omission.” Id. at 274. ¶7 As we noted above, Gray sought direct postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court’s determination that the officer’s testimony was more credible. See id. In its suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22
to the circuit court’s determination that the officer’s testimony was more credible. See id. In its suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22
State v. Devon L. Telfered
deny the motion without a hearing. Id. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6798 - 2005-03-31
deny the motion without a hearing. Id. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
within fifteen days or “this court will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907336 - 2025-02-04
within fifteen days or “this court will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907336 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
County of Green Lake v. John F. Lindemann
. The third prong is a question of fact. Id. at 876. No. 02-0080 4 We will not overturn a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4818 - 2017-09-19
. The third prong is a question of fact. Id. at 876. No. 02-0080 4 We will not overturn a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4818 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Devon L. Telfered
a hearing. Id. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6798 - 2017-09-20
a hearing. Id. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6798 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
penalties that may be imposed if he is found guilty.” Id. at 205 (quoting Pickens v. State, 96 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33803 - 2014-09-15
penalties that may be imposed if he is found guilty.” Id. at 205 (quoting Pickens v. State, 96 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Id. (citation omitted); § 971.12(3). We will affirm the circuit court’s decision denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613552 - 2023-01-24
.” Id. (citation omitted); § 971.12(3). We will affirm the circuit court’s decision denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613552 - 2023-01-24