Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 40299 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.

CA Blank Order
modification. He argued that a change in parole policies constituted a new factor because they frustrated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138442 - 2015-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
condition, and neither his condition nor his positive results from his current treatment constitutes a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52529 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Carmen L. Harrell
erroneously exercised its discretion: (1) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sentence modification based on a new Nos. 2013AP835-CR 2013AP836-CR 2013AP837-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106694 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
condition, and neither his condition nor his positive results from his current treatment constitutes a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52529 - 2010-07-26

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
and the unavailability of sex offender treatment (SOT) until near the end of his prison sentence constitute new factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93668 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on “new factors.” He argues that the claim therefore is not barred because a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99746 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Training resources News For the media Headlines The Third Branch Media coordinators Media resources
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=806&year=2016

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Training resources News For the media Headlines The Third Branch Media coordinators Media resources
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=119&year=2009

COURT OF APPEALS
, challenging his convictions and seeking a new trial. The circuit court denied the motion, and this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45442 - 2010-01-11