Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229393 - 2018-12-12
and response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229393 - 2018-12-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s original and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249624 - 2019-11-06
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s original and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249624 - 2019-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
State v. Jeffrey H. Bostedt
treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31
treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record does not support the 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256625 - 2020-03-17
that the record does not support the 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256625 - 2020-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was tested. ¶2 The record shows that the person who drew Bethke’s blood was a “medical technologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111132 - 2011-06-22
was tested. ¶2 The record shows that the person who drew Bethke’s blood was a “medical technologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111132 - 2011-06-22
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143231 - 2015-06-15
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143231 - 2015-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21