Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 63537 for records.
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246135 - 2019-09-04
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246135 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s original and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249624 - 2019-11-06
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s original and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249624 - 2019-11-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
State v. Jeffrey H. Bostedt
treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31
treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31
Rock County v. Richard L.P.
but were rather mere hyperbole. Because we conclude that the record shows clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19088 - 2005-07-20
but were rather mere hyperbole. Because we conclude that the record shows clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19088 - 2005-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record does not support the 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256625 - 2020-03-17
that the record does not support the 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256625 - 2020-03-17