Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 63655 for records/1000.
Search results 4871 - 4880 of 63655 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. John J. Watson
, 419-20, 402 N.W.2d 723, 731-32 (Ct. App. 1987). The presentence report merely recorded
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8931 - 2017-09-19
, 419-20, 402 N.W.2d 723, 731-32 (Ct. App. 1987). The presentence report merely recorded
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene F. Line
of a postconviction motion for re- sentencing. He claims the trial court erred by failing to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13964 - 2014-09-15
of a postconviction motion for re- sentencing. He claims the trial court erred by failing to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13964 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dale Iversen
then conducted a colloquy with Iversen on the record concerning his right to testify or not testify. Iversen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14229 - 2005-03-31
then conducted a colloquy with Iversen on the record concerning his right to testify or not testify. Iversen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14229 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Lee Miller
Despite Miller’s assertion to the contrary, the record shows that Miller announced at his preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
Despite Miller’s assertion to the contrary, the record shows that Miller announced at his preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 From information in the record, it appears that the potential juror and the victim attended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659546 - 2023-05-25
3 From information in the record, it appears that the potential juror and the victim attended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659546 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we affirm because our independent review of the record reveals grounds to support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100893 - 2017-09-21
, we affirm because our independent review of the record reveals grounds to support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100893 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles L. Davies
this argument on a letter in the record from the trial court to the prosecutor which stated simply: “Enclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16334 - 2005-03-31
this argument on a letter in the record from the trial court to the prosecutor which stated simply: “Enclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
entitling him to sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08
entitling him to sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08
State v. Willie J. Hickles
discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that Hickles’ arguments are without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that Hickles’ arguments are without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
daughter, M.R.S. He contends that the order should be vacated because the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231445 - 2019-01-02
daughter, M.R.S. He contends that the order should be vacated because the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231445 - 2019-01-02