Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48731 - 48740 of 52011 for legal separation.

State v. Crystal C. Parker
legal standards.” McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 277, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971). Strong public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2005-03-31

WI App 59 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP827-CR Complete Title ...
, but we review de novo the ultimate legal question of whether under the circumstances the suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94722 - 2013-05-28

[PDF] NOTICE
decision ignored and did not decide the legal reasoning for his motion—that WIS. STAT. § 347.12(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55446 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal issues we review independently, see id. at 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28010 - 2007-02-05

[PDF] State v. William G. Henriksen
is legally obligated to provide is guilty of a Class E felony. A prosecutor may charge a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7378 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Crystal C. Parker
and a “logical rationale founded upon proper legal standards.” McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 277, 182 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5471 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 2010 WI 77, ¶51, 327 Wis. 2d 1, 785 N.W.2d 516. Be that as it may, Spencer cites no legal authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757062 - 2024-01-30

State v. Greg A. Mayer
decision if the trial court “examined the facts of record, applied a proper legal standard, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13403 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael S. Kreutz
(Ct. App. 1990). Although we are not bound by the trial court's legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8595 - 2005-03-31

Wickes Lumber Company v. Gary D. Everett
court constitute a breach of contract is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19162 - 2005-08-02