Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48761 - 48770 of 59252 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48761 - 48770 of 59252 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Derrick Sandles
), Sandles argues that because he was not arrested at the time of the incident and because, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5719 - 2005-03-31
), Sandles argues that because he was not arrested at the time of the incident and because, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not dispute that he was properly served with the TRO on October 9, and does not claim any legitimate excuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125279 - 2014-10-28
not dispute that he was properly served with the TRO on October 9, and does not claim any legitimate excuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125279 - 2014-10-28
Frontsheet
was not still actively pursuing her interests. Thus, J.J.'s claims against her former husband were never
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35947 - 2009-03-23
was not still actively pursuing her interests. Thus, J.J.'s claims against her former husband were never
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35947 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
was not unduly harsh in light of the factors it deemed relevant. ¶17 We turn to Flores’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84631 - 2012-07-09
was not unduly harsh in light of the factors it deemed relevant. ¶17 We turn to Flores’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84631 - 2012-07-09
CA Blank Order
that defense counsel did. Therefore, there is no basis for bringing a claim alleging that the prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06
that defense counsel did. Therefore, there is no basis for bringing a claim alleging that the prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06
State v. Dennis L. Farr
jeopardy because he has been twice prosecuted for the same underlying matter. Specifically, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31
jeopardy because he has been twice prosecuted for the same underlying matter. Specifically, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jody Mayo
in this refusal after the trial court rejected her constitutional claim. Mayo testified that, while she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11877 - 2005-03-31
in this refusal after the trial court rejected her constitutional claim. Mayo testified that, while she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11877 - 2005-03-31
J.G. Wentworth S.S.C. Limited Partnership v. Sean Edward Callahan
on the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 322 and the cases that follow, claims that the assignments here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4487 - 2005-03-31
on the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 322 and the cases that follow, claims that the assignments here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4487 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fail to adequately connect these arguments to any underlying cognizable legal claim that seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
fail to adequately connect these arguments to any underlying cognizable legal claim that seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rolando M. Tong
residence, the site of the search. He claims there is nothing in Powell’s affidavit from which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21
residence, the site of the search. He claims there is nothing in Powell’s affidavit from which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21