Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48761 - 48770 of 59731 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 48761 - 48770 of 59731 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Spring Maclin
Littleton to testify at trial. Maclin claims that Littleton would verify that Maclin was at St. Catherine's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10146 - 2005-03-31
Littleton to testify at trial. Maclin claims that Littleton would verify that Maclin was at St. Catherine's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10146 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Haecker
, Haecker challenges his sentence, claiming that it constitutes an erroneous exercise of discretion. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13375 - 2005-03-31
, Haecker challenges his sentence, claiming that it constitutes an erroneous exercise of discretion. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13375 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
noted. [2] We question whether Josephson preserved the constitutional claim he raises on appeal because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36394 - 2009-05-05
noted. [2] We question whether Josephson preserved the constitutional claim he raises on appeal because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36394 - 2009-05-05
State v. Roger E. Smiley
, there would be no merit to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Other Issues No other issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
, there would be no merit to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Other Issues No other issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter James Nickitas
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
CA Blank Order
, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623, 350 N.W.2d 633 (1984). The court “[took] with a grain of salt” Ynocenio’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133546 - 2015-01-27
, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623, 350 N.W.2d 633 (1984). The court “[took] with a grain of salt” Ynocenio’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133546 - 2015-01-27
Cle A. Gray, Jr. v. Donald Gudmanson
court affirming the decision of the adjustment committee. We also affirm because we reject Gray’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11574 - 2005-03-31
court affirming the decision of the adjustment committee. We also affirm because we reject Gray’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11574 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motions. The court also denied Brady’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
motions. The court also denied Brady’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
properly framed in postconviction proceedings as a claim that counsel was ineffective for not objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30636 - 2014-09-15
properly framed in postconviction proceedings as a claim that counsel was ineffective for not objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30636 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
administrator of the Estate of Mary E. Guy (“Guy Estate”) and claiming malpractice against him, should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27497 - 2006-12-18
administrator of the Estate of Mary E. Guy (“Guy Estate”) and claiming malpractice against him, should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27497 - 2006-12-18