Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48771 - 48780 of 68274 for did.
Search results 48771 - 48780 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
before it, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by denying the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244195 - 2019-07-23
before it, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by denying the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244195 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
store and did not know its contents. 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
store and did not know its contents. 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
State v. Adam D. Steinke
. § 343.305(9). Steinke argues that the law enforcement officer did not have sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6978 - 2005-03-31
. § 343.305(9). Steinke argues that the law enforcement officer did not have sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Edwards
. The trial court concluded that the taking of the blood sample from Edwards did not violate the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court concluded that the taking of the blood sample from Edwards did not violate the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
shenanigans” did not give the judge the right to impose an “unconstitutionally outrageous fine”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29588 - 2014-09-15
shenanigans” did not give the judge the right to impose an “unconstitutionally outrageous fine”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29588 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to seven years’ imprisonment on July 23, 2004. Smith did not appeal. In January 2011, Smith filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
to seven years’ imprisonment on July 23, 2004. Smith did not appeal. In January 2011, Smith filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2008AP2297 5 did not disregard the support objective of maintenance, but concluded that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2008AP2297 5 did not disregard the support objective of maintenance, but concluded that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such No. 2012AP2699 4 arguments in his reply brief, he did not. Instead, his reply brief was entirely silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107151 - 2017-09-21
such No. 2012AP2699 4 arguments in his reply brief, he did not. Instead, his reply brief was entirely silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107151 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth L. Champion
The record conclusively establishes that trial counsel did not unreasonably abandon a suppression issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3228 - 2005-03-31
The record conclusively establishes that trial counsel did not unreasonably abandon a suppression issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
them. Finally, Thompson alleged postconviction counsel was ineffective because she “did not do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
them. Finally, Thompson alleged postconviction counsel was ineffective because she “did not do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12