Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48781 - 48790 of 57646 for id.
Search results 48781 - 48790 of 57646 for id.
Sid Grinker Company, Inc. v. Rudy Treml
is frivolous is a question of law. Id. Whether sanctions are warranted is a matter of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5115 - 2005-03-31
is frivolous is a question of law. Id. Whether sanctions are warranted is a matter of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5115 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
of this question is de novo. Id. at 310. A postconviction motion sufficient to meet this standard should “allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26594 - 2006-09-27
of this question is de novo. Id. at 310. A postconviction motion sufficient to meet this standard should “allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26594 - 2006-09-27
Waylon M. Redding v. David H. Schwarz
. Id. at 725-26. In order to revoke, the division must also find that confinement is necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 725-26. In order to revoke, the division must also find that confinement is necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
unless a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28930 - 2007-06-26
unless a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28930 - 2007-06-26
Eunice Cohodas v. Catherine Hodkiewicz
of the testator or the fact of undue influence. Id. ¶9 There is no evidence Hodkiewicz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25657 - 2006-06-26
of the testator or the fact of undue influence. Id. ¶9 There is no evidence Hodkiewicz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25657 - 2006-06-26
Mary L. Schommer v. Michael W. Schommer
arguments on Schommer’s behalf, which we cannot do because we cannot “serve as both advocate and judge.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4628 - 2005-03-31
arguments on Schommer’s behalf, which we cannot do because we cannot “serve as both advocate and judge.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4628 - 2005-03-31
David J. Gehl v. Town of Perry
or nuisances on adjacent land. Id. Contrary to Gehl’s assertions, we find nothing in the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25531 - 2006-06-14
or nuisances on adjacent land. Id. Contrary to Gehl’s assertions, we find nothing in the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25531 - 2006-06-14
State v. Dale Pultz
in a plain instance of mistake” or erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. Further, findings of fact made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8199 - 2005-03-31
in a plain instance of mistake” or erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. Further, findings of fact made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8199 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
decision if the record shows a reasonable basis for the decision. Id. We summarize the officer’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134544 - 2015-02-10
decision if the record shows a reasonable basis for the decision. Id. We summarize the officer’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134544 - 2015-02-10
State v. Robert J. Panosh
interrogation. Id. at § 51. Panosh concedes that this court lacks authority to require that all custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24835 - 2006-04-17
interrogation. Id. at § 51. Panosh concedes that this court lacks authority to require that all custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24835 - 2006-04-17