Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4881 - 4890 of 69078 for as he.
Search results 4881 - 4890 of 69078 for as he.
State v. James E. Brown
contends that he did not enter his guilty pleas knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. To support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25868 - 2006-07-11
contends that he did not enter his guilty pleas knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. To support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25868 - 2006-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
there was sufficient evidence for the court to find that he engaged in disorderly conduct. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45138 - 2009-12-29
there was sufficient evidence for the court to find that he engaged in disorderly conduct. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45138 - 2009-12-29
State v. Randolph A. Clark
on a one-way street at 12:40 a.m. when he was stopped by a Milwaukee police officer, who suspected him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
on a one-way street at 12:40 a.m. when he was stopped by a Milwaukee police officer, who suspected him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Miller
Miller appeals a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
Miller appeals a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the accident, Kuchembecker had x-rays and there was damage to his truck in the amount of $4,695. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32843 - 2008-05-28
of the accident, Kuchembecker had x-rays and there was damage to his truck in the amount of $4,695. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32843 - 2008-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion.[1] He claims that the verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion.[1] He claims that the verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
State v. Thomas C. Smith
a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arthur W. Sanger, Jr.
at the scene, he observed a vehicle in the ditch, a tow-truck that had just pulled up, and a gentleman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5330 - 2017-09-19
at the scene, he observed a vehicle in the ditch, a tow-truck that had just pulled up, and a gentleman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5330 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial.1 He argues that the trial court erred in communicating with the jury outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65821 - 2014-09-15
motion for a new trial.1 He argues that the trial court erred in communicating with the jury outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65821 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
there was sufficient evidence for the court to find that he engaged in disorderly conduct. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
there was sufficient evidence for the court to find that he engaged in disorderly conduct. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15