Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4881 - 4890 of 63655 for records/1000.

State v. Charles L. Davies
this argument on a letter in the record from the trial court to the prosecutor which stated simply: “Enclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16334 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
entitling him to sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08

State v. Willie J. Hickles
discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that Hickles’ arguments are without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
daughter, M.R.S. He contends that the order should be vacated because the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231445 - 2019-01-02

[PDF] State v. David Lee Miller
to the contrary, the record shows that Miller announced at his preliminary hearing that he did not want a speedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25540 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
, however, is not in the record. On April 18, 1997, Rowsey filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12614 - 2017-09-21

Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
, is not in the record. On April 18, 1997, Rowsey filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lyman Lumber of Wisconsin, Inc. v. First Federal Savings Bank LaCrosse-Madison
, First Federal would record its mortgage first, and Lyman's mortgage would be recorded second. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11599 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128829 - 2014-11-12

State v. Dale Iversen
then conducted a colloquy with Iversen on the record concerning his right to testify or not testify. Iversen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31