Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4881 - 4890 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 4881 - 4890 of 58510 for speedy trial.
State v. Roger S. Walker
of conviction entered against him after a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3061 - 2005-03-31
of conviction entered against him after a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3061 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Oshkosh v. Robert M. Sheets
orders denying his suppression motion and for an adjournment of the trial. While we hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3001 - 2017-09-19
orders denying his suppression motion and for an adjournment of the trial. While we hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3001 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger S. Walker
from a judgment of conviction entered against him after a jury trial, and from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3061 - 2017-09-19
from a judgment of conviction entered against him after a jury trial, and from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3061 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael Aloysius Huston
-CR 2 WIS. STAT. ยง 948.02(1). 1 Huston argues the trial court erred by (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6496 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 WIS. STAT. ยง 948.02(1). 1 Huston argues the trial court erred by (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Konshak
, an exception exists for challenges to trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8791 - 2017-09-19
, an exception exists for challenges to trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8791 - 2017-09-19
State v. David S. Rhodes
guilty in the first phase of a bifurcated trial and, in the second phase, determined that Rhodes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
guilty in the first phase of a bifurcated trial and, in the second phase, determined that Rhodes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Konshak
, an exception exists for challenges to trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8202 - 2017-09-19
, an exception exists for challenges to trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Konshak
, an exception exists for challenges to trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8201 - 2017-09-19
, an exception exists for challenges to trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8201 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Grunwald contends that he is No. 2012AP2531-CR 2 entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100496 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. Grunwald contends that he is No. 2012AP2531-CR 2 entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100496 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because he received the ineffective assistance of counsel in several respects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100496 - 2013-08-07
is entitled to a new trial because he received the ineffective assistance of counsel in several respects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100496 - 2013-08-07