Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48801 - 48810 of 82874 for simple case search.
Search results 48801 - 48810 of 82874 for simple case search.
Lisa R. Steeno v. Joseph L. Steeno
that equitable estoppel is available in child support cases but disagree that it applies here. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6750 - 2005-03-31
that equitable estoppel is available in child support cases but disagree that it applies here. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6750 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The seminal case in Wisconsin sentencing jurisprudence is McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 182 N.W.2d 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26
The seminal case in Wisconsin sentencing jurisprudence is McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 182 N.W.2d 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case shows that defense counsel and the court explained the elements of the offense to Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18
in this case shows that defense counsel and the court explained the elements of the offense to Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18
Louis Salimes v. Town of Caledonia Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
when hearing the disciplinary matter. Section 62.13(5), Stats., is to be used in any case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31
when hearing the disciplinary matter. Section 62.13(5), Stats., is to be used in any case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts “a discretionary stay [was] a ‘worst case’ option under the facts presented in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104447 - 2017-09-21
asserts “a discretionary stay [was] a ‘worst case’ option under the facts presented in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was sentenced by another judge shortly before the sentencing in these cases. Because a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
was sentenced by another judge shortly before the sentencing in these cases. Because a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James T. Carey, Jr. v. Ted Swiontek, Sr.
that their affidavits raise a genuine issue of material fact whether negotiations, as defined by the case law, occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11072 - 2017-09-19
that their affidavits raise a genuine issue of material fact whether negotiations, as defined by the case law, occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11072 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 948.11(2)(a),[2] with a felony intimidation of a witness charge in a companion case dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10
. Stat. § 948.11(2)(a),[2] with a felony intimidation of a witness charge in a companion case dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The record in this case supports a conclusion that the deputy could have reasonably assumed that, if Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99820 - 2017-09-21
. The record in this case supports a conclusion that the deputy could have reasonably assumed that, if Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99820 - 2017-09-21
Clyde Sukanen v. School District of Monroe
that violation of this policy is unlawful, Sukanen cites several cases that stand for the proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4415 - 2005-03-31
that violation of this policy is unlawful, Sukanen cites several cases that stand for the proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4415 - 2005-03-31