Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48821 - 48830 of 69122 for j o e y.
Search results 48821 - 48830 of 69122 for j o e y.
State v. Kevin Giebel
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, Attorney General, and Marguerite M. Moeller, Assistant Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8050 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, Attorney General, and Marguerite M. Moeller, Assistant Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8050 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Hanson
. Stat. §§ 961.41(3g)(e)2 and 939.05. He filed a motion to suppress evidence.[2] The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2438 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §§ 961.41(3g)(e)2 and 939.05. He filed a motion to suppress evidence.[2] The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633- 34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[W]e will not reverse the [trial] court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177499 - 2017-09-21
. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633- 34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[W]e will not reverse the [trial] court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177499 - 2017-09-21
Cynthia M. Stocking v. James Stocking
to be the persons who executed the foregoing document and acknowledged the same. /s/ Daniel E. Stocking, Notary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
to be the persons who executed the foregoing document and acknowledged the same. /s/ Daniel E. Stocking, Notary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the state that [shows] my plea was possed [sic] to still maintain my innocen[c]e to the public encounter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121276 - 2014-09-04
the state that [shows] my plea was possed [sic] to still maintain my innocen[c]e to the public encounter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121276 - 2014-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(e) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129509 - 2014-11-25
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(e) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129509 - 2014-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Michael Evans
County: LAURENCE C. GRAM, JR., and JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judges. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2677 - 2017-09-19
County: LAURENCE C. GRAM, JR., and JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judges. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2677 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James M. Kriska v. Madison Area Technical College
. WIS. STAT. § 40.23(2m)(e). If the employee at retirement is not at least fifty-seven years old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5851 - 2017-09-19
. WIS. STAT. § 40.23(2m)(e). If the employee at retirement is not at least fifty-seven years old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5851 - 2017-09-19
State v. Billy W. Gladney
“[E]rror is harmless if it is ‘clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16295 - 2005-03-31
“[E]rror is harmless if it is ‘clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) Hock could smell the “odor of intoxicants” on Dotson during his arrest. The State argues that “[e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307115 - 2020-11-24
) Hock could smell the “odor of intoxicants” on Dotson during his arrest. The State argues that “[e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307115 - 2020-11-24