Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48861 - 48870 of 83330 for simple case search.
Search results 48861 - 48870 of 83330 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case that the admission was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76202 - 2014-09-15
a prima facie case that the admission was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John F. Draves
his house, Draves was charged with making threats to harm the social worker involved in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10858 - 2017-09-20
his house, Draves was charged with making threats to harm the social worker involved in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10858 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William Avery
to the homicide, which would involve trying “the entire homicide case.” The court refused to allow a mini
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21
to the homicide, which would involve trying “the entire homicide case.” The court refused to allow a mini
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 111
2010 WI APP 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52646 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52646 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David L. Nichols
2002 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-3032-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16563 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-3032-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chet Woodward
in this case? [WOODWARD]: Yes, I understand that. THE COURT: [Defense counsel], do you believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12378 - 2017-09-21
in this case? [WOODWARD]: Yes, I understand that. THE COURT: [Defense counsel], do you believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12378 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of imprisonment on the first count, consecutive to his revocation on a different case, and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2013-05-13
of imprisonment on the first count, consecutive to his revocation on a different case, and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2013-05-13
Brown County v. Heather M. A.
the petition. The court set the case for a fact-finding hearing. ¶3 Heather, her mother, and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6318 - 2005-03-31
the petition. The court set the case for a fact-finding hearing. ¶3 Heather, her mother, and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circumstances of the case, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244485 - 2019-08-07
the circumstances of the case, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244485 - 2019-08-07
State v. Michael E. Learmont
, it would "wait and hold this case back" or "even adjourn the proceedings." Relying on the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31
, it would "wait and hold this case back" or "even adjourn the proceedings." Relying on the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31