Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48861 - 48870 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 48861 - 48870 of 83359 for simple case search.
State v. Stephen S.
did, and his TPR case was tried before a jury. The jury unanimously found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
did, and his TPR case was tried before a jury. The jury unanimously found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See No. 2022AP1767
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811776 - 2024-06-11
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See No. 2022AP1767
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811776 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
Oak Hill Development Corporation v. Board of Review for the City of Oak Creek
. Additionally, interpreting the Manual in this case to exclude the use of the Development Method valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12671 - 2017-09-21
. Additionally, interpreting the Manual in this case to exclude the use of the Development Method valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary A. Klovers v. City of Beaver Dam
before the board. Id. at ¶20. In the present case, no record from the board of review was before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3640 - 2017-09-19
before the board. Id. at ¶20. In the present case, no record from the board of review was before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3640 - 2017-09-19
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all evidence of events occurring prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4562 - 2005-03-31
discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all evidence of events occurring prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4562 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
children and in particular the problematic process undertaken in this particular case.” The prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38802 - 2014-09-15
children and in particular the problematic process undertaken in this particular case.” The prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38802 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Sales were dismissed from the case on October 23, 2007, pursuant to a stipulation with Tweet/Garot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
. Sales were dismissed from the case on October 23, 2007, pursuant to a stipulation with Tweet/Garot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case involving Hazel, the State filed an “other acts” motion seeking to introduce evidence about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106333 - 2017-09-21
in this case involving Hazel, the State filed an “other acts” motion seeking to introduce evidence about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106333 - 2017-09-21