Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 98499 for court records search online.

COURT OF APPEALS
, the court denied the suppression motion. The court based its decision that the search was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence in the record, as discussed above, we will not disturb it on appeal. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110027 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). 2 We acknowledge that the circuit court’s reasoning that the stop could be extended to “search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249376 - 2019-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 3, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710212 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162969 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress, challenging the search that led to the discovery of the cocaine.[1] The trial court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47930 - 2010-03-16

COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause to conduct the search. On those bases, the trial court denied the motion to suppress. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30929 - 2007-11-20