Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 17156 for probate/1000.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 17156 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and ordered three years of probation, and as a condition of probation the court ordered one year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
sentence and ordered three years of probation, and as a condition of probation the court ordered one year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction entered following the revocation of his probation and from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219506 - 2018-09-26
of conviction entered following the revocation of his probation and from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219506 - 2018-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Mitchell
to the battery count, and agreed to recommend consecutive probation on the robbery count. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2646 - 2017-09-19
to the battery count, and agreed to recommend consecutive probation on the robbery count. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2646 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to return him to competency for his probation revocation hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880024 - 2024-11-26
to return him to competency for his probation revocation hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880024 - 2024-11-26
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
on five years’ consecutive probation.[2] Olmsted filed a postconviction motion seeking resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
on five years’ consecutive probation.[2] Olmsted filed a postconviction motion seeking resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and placed Schreiber on probation. There is no manifest injustice upon which Schreiber could withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140873 - 2017-09-21
, and placed Schreiber on probation. There is no manifest injustice upon which Schreiber could withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prison sentence, imposed and stayed in favor of probation. The circuit court accepted Troupe’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127140 - 2017-09-21
a prison sentence, imposed and stayed in favor of probation. The circuit court accepted Troupe’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127140 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and ordered three years of probation, and as a condition of probation the court ordered one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
sentence and ordered three years of probation, and as a condition of probation the court ordered one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and placed Orr on probation for fifteen years, consecutive to the prison sentence in count one. After Orr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230814 - 2018-12-12
and placed Orr on probation for fifteen years, consecutive to the prison sentence in count one. After Orr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230814 - 2018-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at trial, Blahnik’s term and conditions of probation, and Blahnik’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545758 - 2022-07-19
at trial, Blahnik’s term and conditions of probation, and Blahnik’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545758 - 2022-07-19