Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 64825 for records.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 64825 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Antonio McAfee
was deficient No. 2004AP995-CR 5 performance because it was irrationally based on record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18213 - 2017-09-21
was deficient No. 2004AP995-CR 5 performance because it was irrationally based on record facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18213 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1162799 - 2026-08-20
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1162799 - 2026-08-20
State v. Kevin D. Waite
arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10609 - 2005-03-31
arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if the lump sum were not paid by a specified date. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098095 - 2026-03-31
if the lump sum were not paid by a specified date. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098095 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641990 - 2023-04-11
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641990 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence and make a record that “reflect[s] adequate consideration of and weight to each factor” in WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30
the evidence and make a record that “reflect[s] adequate consideration of and weight to each factor” in WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30
State v. Justin F.
the trial court’s decision to waive jurisdiction if the record indicates that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12443 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s decision to waive jurisdiction if the record indicates that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12443 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31