Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 63511 for records.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 63511 for records.
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129276 - 2014-11-17
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129276 - 2014-11-17
State v. Steven T. Geary
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12908 - 2005-03-31
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12908 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the “responsibility to ensure completion of the appellate record and ‘when an appellate record is incomplete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919421 - 2025-02-25
the “responsibility to ensure completion of the appellate record and ‘when an appellate record is incomplete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919421 - 2025-02-25
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92545 - 2013-02-11
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92545 - 2013-02-11
State v. Jamel Gregory
-degree recklessly endangering safety. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9780 - 2005-03-31
-degree recklessly endangering safety. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9780 - 2005-03-31
Douglas J. Richer v. Donald Gudmanson
affirming a prison disciplinary decision. We conclude that the record does not support the finding of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12978 - 2012-11-15
affirming a prison disciplinary decision. We conclude that the record does not support the finding of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12978 - 2012-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2019AP442 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278648 - 2020-08-19
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2019AP442 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278648 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
October 18, 2012
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88518 - 2014-09-15
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the specifics of these issues should refer to the records and briefs filed with the Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946230 - 2025-04-21
the specifics of these issues should refer to the records and briefs filed with the Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946230 - 2025-04-21
State v. William E. Spaeth
penalties prescribed for fifth-time OAR offenders. Because we conclude that the record does not adequately
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17032 - 2005-03-31
penalties prescribed for fifth-time OAR offenders. Because we conclude that the record does not adequately
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17032 - 2005-03-31