Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4891 - 4900 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.

COURT OF APPEALS
argues it is entitled to relief in this certiorari review because the Board committed various legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18

Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
by the cost approach was appropriate. Wilson Realty filed a petition for certiorari review with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7474 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by certiorari is limited to: (1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21

[PDF] Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
was appropriate. Wilson Realty filed a petition for certiorari review with the circuit court, which affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
4 ¶5 Judicial review of revocation decisions by certiorari is limited to: (1) Whether the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
. DISCUSSION This appeal arises by way of statutory certiorari. See § 70.47(13), STATS. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13004 - 2017-09-21

P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
. DISCUSSION This appeal arises by way of statutory certiorari. See § 70.47(13), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13003 - 2005-03-31

P.J.H. Company v. Board of Review of the City of Wauwatosa
. DISCUSSION This appeal arises by way of statutory certiorari. See § 70.47(13), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13004 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and Blanchard, JJ. Robert L. Tatum, pro se, appeals circuit court orders denying Tatum relief on certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161495 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2 The Goll Trust notes that Penkalski’s appendix filed in this court is not in proper form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30