Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48901 - 48910 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 48901 - 48910 of 74849 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
] and Dimitri were to end it would have a detrimental effect on her. (Citations to the Record omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26677 - 2006-10-09
] and Dimitri were to end it would have a detrimental effect on her. (Citations to the Record omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26677 - 2006-10-09
State v. Brian K. Rice
statements at his sentencing conflict with the official records listing his sentences, and that the oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
statements at his sentencing conflict with the official records listing his sentences, and that the oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
account. On de novo review of the record created before the commissioner and after considering updated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233841 - 2019-06-20
account. On de novo review of the record created before the commissioner and after considering updated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233841 - 2019-06-20
Barron County v. Brian T.
it makes an order that it knows is impossible to comply with under the facts in the record. Brian counters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4617 - 2005-03-31
it makes an order that it knows is impossible to comply with under the facts in the record. Brian counters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4617 - 2005-03-31
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
on the basis of claims preclusion. The record does not support the Everses' premise. The trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13852 - 2005-03-31
on the basis of claims preclusion. The record does not support the Everses' premise. The trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the orders with respect to Tiggs’s second claim for sentence credit because we conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
the orders with respect to Tiggs’s second claim for sentence credit because we conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
State v. Carl C. Gilbert
independently reviewed the record to determine whether there are any arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11538 - 2017-09-19
independently reviewed the record to determine whether there are any arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11538 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
-1805-CR -4- the entire record, the trailer was not sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9299 - 2017-09-19
-1805-CR -4- the entire record, the trailer was not sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9299 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
credit because we conclude that the record is insufficiently developed and fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
credit because we conclude that the record is insufficiently developed and fact-finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
damages and attorney fees. Staeheli offers no legal authority or citation to the record in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61248 - 2014-09-15
damages and attorney fees. Staeheli offers no legal authority or citation to the record in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61248 - 2014-09-15